Numerical Prediction of Flow over a Prolate Spheroid Undergoing a Pitchup Maneuver

 

Accurate numerical prediction of truly unsteady, high excursion, high-Reynolds number separated flows is of great interest in aeronautics and naval hydrodynamics. The separated flow around a three-dimensional body almost always gives rise to several adverse phenomena in aero- and hydrodynamics such as the increase in drag, loss of lift and amplification of unsteady effects including fluctuations in the pressure field. It is often possible to avoid separation by placing limitations on the operating conditions. However, there are times when separated flow cannot be avoided and must be dealt with.

Prediction of the time-dependent flow around a 6:1 prolate spheroid undergoing a pitchup maneuver was obtained using Detached-Eddy Simulation (DES). DES is a hybrid formulation which attempts to capitalize on the often adequate performance of Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) models in predicting boundary layer growth and separation, and to use Large-Eddy Simulation (LES) away from solid surfaces to model the typically geometry-dependent and unsteady scales of motion in separated regions. The DES formulation is based on a modification to the Spalart-Allmaras RANS model such that the model reduces to RANS formulation near solid surfaces and to a subgrid scale model away from the wall. Flowfield predictions are evaluated using experimental measurements and also contrasted against predictions of the flows at static angles of attack (a) of 10o, 20o, and 30o. Flowfield parameters are the same as in the experiments, the Reynolds number based on freestream velocity and the model length is 4.2x10-6, the boundary layers on the spheroid surface are tripped at x/L=0.2. The spheroid pitches about its centroid from 0o to 30o angle of attack over a period of 0.33 seconds, corresponding to a dimensionless pitch rate of 0.047 (based on the freestream speed and model length). Solutions of the compressible Navier-Stokes equations are obtained on unstructured grids, rigid-body motion of the spheroid is accomplished using an Arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian (ALE) formulation. Compared to the solutions at fixed angles of attack, the flow structure for the pitchup case lags that of static-a flows. Surface flows for the static- and maneuvering-geometry solutions show marked differences at the conclusion of the pitchup. At 20o angle of attack the pitchup solution does not possess a secondary separation as in the static-a case. Skin friction predictions exhibit similar variation as the experimental measurements of Wetzel and Simpson, though are shifted below the measured values. Predictions of the azimuthal pressure distribution exhibits good agreement with the measurements of Hoang et al. Development of the normal force and pitching moment for the maneuvering geometry also show reasonable agreement with measured values.
 

Oil flow patterns and vorticity contours at α = 10o, (a) Static geometry, (b) Pitchup geometry

 

Oil flow patterns and vorticity contours at α = 20o, (a) Static geometry, (b) Pitchup geometry

 

Oil flow patterns and vorticity contours at α = 30o, (a) Static geometry, (b) Pitchup geometry