Financial
Management, FINA 224
Representative
Syllabus
Professor: Neil
G. Cohen, DBA, CFA
Office: Department
of Finance, Funger Hall Suite 501, GWU, 2201 G St. NW,
Office Hours: 11AM-12Noon,
4-5PM Mon & Wed, and by appointment
Phone, Voicemail: 202-994-7276
Fax: 202-994-5014
Email: ngcohen@gwu.edu
Website:http://home.gwu.edu/~ngcohen
Course
Description
The
framework for the course is the creation, transfer, and destruction of
shareholder value, as practiced by corporate financial managers and the
commercial and investment bankers who advise and assist them in raising
the funds they need. All assignments are case studies about these topics:
working capital policy, capital budgeting, financing with debt and equity,
project finance, dividend policy, valuation, and investment banking in
the contexts of private equity, venture capital, initial public offering,
leveraged buyout, and management buyout. Part I emphasizes building skills
in financial analysis using basic case studies; part II applies the skills
to intermediate and advanced case studies.
Prerequisites
·MBAD
250, required
·FINA
221, strongly recommended
Materials
·Higgins,
Analysis for Financial Management, latest edition (required)
·Case
Studies (required – handed out in class; copyright fee of about $3 per
case will be collected)
·Articles
(recommended) – Blackboard
·The
Wall Street Journal (strongly recommended)
·FATOOLS
Excel Templates -Blackboard
·A
financial calculator is handy during class
·Textbook
from MBAD 250, FINA 221
·…..@gwu.edu
email address for Blackboard access
HOW THIS COURSE WORKS
1-
the background and facts
2-
the issue(s)
3-
analysis you did and the results
4-
your recommendation(s) for solving the problem.
The
rest of the time will be used to introduce the next assignment, or to discuss
topical Wall Street Journal and New York Times articles.
·Use
of spreadsheet software is a necessity for most, but not all, of the assignments.
FATOOLS templates are posted on Blackboard as well as special templates
for some assignments to eliminate data-entry time.
·Think
the professor as your coach. He guides and critiques your practice.
·Learning
financial analysis is cumulative - you learn it by doing it - like swimming
or tennis. Your grade is determined by the effort you put in during the
course and what you know how do at the end of the course. The results of
your work early in the course will be rough and you will not feel comfortable
about it. But if you let feelings of inadequacy stop you from practicing
the analysis and making the recommendations, you won’t learn and you won’t
grow.
·Current
articles from The Wall Street Journal will be discussed in class
regularly. You should have your own subscription.
Attendance
is mandatory.
·A
case-study course involves continuous student-to-student and student-to-professor
discussion. Much of the learning occurs during the class, as you work through
what you prepared in advance, ask questions about it, and improve on it.Therefore,
attendance is mandatory. If you decide to miss a class, that is
your decision. Please do not ask the professor for permission to do so.
You are responsible for anything missed.
·Think
about how you should approach the problem by studying the related material
in Higgins. Perform the analysis by going back-and-forth between the example
provided by Higgins and the information provided in the case.
·Interpret
what the analysis is telling you, and make your recommendation based on
the analysis.
·Rely
on class time to ask the questions you need to have answered, so you can
perfect your skills.
·Group
write-ups are not acceptable,
but you can use the results of teamwork and jointly prepared exhibits as
the take-off point for your own writing. Cite names of each contributor
on each group-prepared exhibit.
·Write-ups
will be collected and graded at random several times during the semester.
When they are not graded, the 90 minutes of discussion time gives you ample
opportunity to appraise the quality of your work and ask the necessary
questions.
·Write-ups
count only for 20% of your final grade. The professor/coach does not expect
perfection - he regards your case summaries as work-in-progress, not finished
product. Do the best you can with every case - figure out what recommendation
it leads you to, and write it down. Then you are ready to participate in
the class discussion, to identify your mistakes and ask the questions to
fix them.
·The
write-up has a two-page maximum, plus relevant exhibits.
1-
cite the issue(s) involved very briefly,
2-
cite the recommendation(s) you are making, and make it unambiguous
3-
briefly discuss the type of analysis performed and the results. Do not
say “see the exhibit.” Explain the meaning of the exhibit.
4-
cite the pros and cons of your recommendation(s)
·Do
not repeat the facts
of the case that everybody has read.
·When
you use sensitivity analysis, it is not necessary to submit a separate
page for each run – show the base case analysis and prepare a summary exhibit.
·The
write-up can be in any form you choose - paragraphs, outline, bullet points,
sentence fragments. It must be word processed. Eliminate cover sheets,
plastic covers, etc. Just put your name and the name of the case at the
top of the first page and staple it. It’s a homework assignment, not a
term paper. Keep it simple!
·You
can write on it during class – it’s your homework. If it is collected,
turn it in.
Grading
·Attendance
is required.
·Late
papers are not acceptable because
that defeats the purpose of the course – advance preparation for class
discussion. Please do not ask for permission to hand in a late paper.
·Class
Participation50%
·Written
Summaries20%
·Mid-Term
Exam30%
·No
make-up for missed exam
·You
are graded as an individual, not as a member of a group. If you are silent,
and turn in only group products, there is no basis for your grade.
ASSIGNMENTS
If
GWU closes because of snow or another emergency, class will be conducted
on-line, at the scheduled time, using a Blackboard chatroom.
Part
I of the course runs from January 24 – March 7, consisting of mostly basic,
single-issue cases emphasizing the tools of financial analysis, closing
with an exam:
Jan
24
Capital
Budgeting
Higgins,
Chapter 7
Financial
Statement Analysis and Forecasting
Higgins,
Chapter 3
Caselette:
AYOG Industries
Feb
7
Part I -Valuation
Higgins,
Chapter 8, 9
Caselette: AYOG Industries, continued
Part
I - Raising Permanent Financing
Caselette:
AYOG Industries, continued
Higgins,
Chapters 5-6
1.Working
with your previously established forecast for Ayog, determine the maximum
amount of borrowing Ayog can handle, i.e., its debt capacity. You probably
view the production capacity of a business as a resource. Should you view
its debt capacity as a resource? Be ready to explain.
2.Using
FATOOLS05 Financing template, decide if the external financing needed financed
should come from debt or equity sources. Be ready to discuss your recommendation
in terms of the income, risk, control, marketability, flexibility, and
timing aspects of the two alternatives.
Part
II - Lease vs. Borrow
Case: AMTRAK Acela Financing
Case:
Dell’s Working Capital
Mar
7
Exam:
closed book-closed note, bring financial calculator
Part
II of the course applies the analysis skills from Part I to intermediate
and advanced multiple-issue cases, closing with a two-day negotiations
simulation:
Mar
21
Capital
Budgeting
Case:
Diamond Chemicals (A) & (B)
For
the (A) case:
For
the (B) case:
1.Are
the Merseyside and
2.How
do the two projects compare using NPV, IRR, and Payback Period as ranking
criteria?
3.The
managerial flexibility in the Merseyside does not get quantified and is
therefore not included in Frank Greystock’s cash flow analysis. Is this
omission serious?
4.Consider
the differences in style between Lucy Morris (Merseyside) and Elizabeth
Eustace (
5.If
you are James Fawn, which project would you propose to the CEO?
Mar
28
Capital Budgeting
Case:
Euroland Foods (use
template posted on Blackboard)
Apr
4
Investment Banking, Private Equity, Initial Public Offering
Articles:
Case:
Teleswitch (A)
Apr
11
Merger and Acquisition
Case: The Acquisition of Consolidated Rail Corporation (A)
Case:
Norris Industries (use templates posted on Blackboard)
1.Explain
the structure of the LBO.
2.Is
$43.05 a fair price from the viewpoint of the selling shareholders?
3.As
Sam Mencoff, would you accept the KKR offer?
Case:
Pinkerton’s (A) (use
templates posted on Blackboard)
Case:
GM-Euroslavia
Students
will be divided into groups, Red and Blue, for this two-day negotiations
simulation. Each group will be divided into four teams, representing the
parties at interest in General Motors attempt to purchase an automobile
manufacturer being privatized by the Polish government; Polish Privatization
Agency, GM Treasury, GM Marketing and Planning, and GM Opel Manufacturing.
(Please fill
out and hand in)
STUDENT INFORMATION
(FINA 224)
NAME________________________________________________________________
EMAIL
ADDRESS_______________________________________________________
EMPLOYER____________________________________________________________
WORK
HOURS PER WEEK _______________________________________________
TITLE_________________________________________________________________
YEAR'S
EXPERIENCE__________
DAYTIME
TELEPHONE______________________HOME TELEPHONE____________________
AGE_______
DEGREES/MAJORS______________________________________________________________
FINANCE
& ACCOUNTING COURSES TAKEN:
COURSEWHENWHERE
POST?MBA
PLANS
EDUCATION:
CAREER: