|
|
|||||||||||
AMST 3112.1:
American Everyday Life
At Home in TV-Land:
Television & Everyday Life
University of Minnesota
Winter 1997
Wuling Hall 140
MWF 9:00 - 9:55
Instructor: Eric Drown
Teaching Assistant: Matt Basso
Office: 10
Scott Hall Writing
Lab: 330 Lind Hall
Office Hours: T Th11:15-12:15 & by appointment Office Phone: 626-9247
E-mail addresses: drown001@maroon.tc.umn.edu American
Studies Office: 104 Scott Hall
bass0061@maroon.tc.umn.edu
Introduction
At Home in TV-land: Television
& Everyday Life explores questions of domesticity and television. What happens when a mass-medium enters the
home for the first-time? When did TV first become a domestic appliance? How did
it change the way men, women, children, and families lived? How has home-life
been represented on television? How has television become an important element
in the struggle for American democracy? We'll be exploring these critical
questions aesthetically, historically, and economically. Course texts include
Marshall McLuhan and Quentin Fiore, The
Medium is the Massage, Henry Jenkins, Textual
Poachers: Television and Fan Culture; Lynn Spigel & Denise Mann, eds., Private Screenings: TV and the Female
Consumer; Lynn Spigel, Make Room for
TV; and Douglas Kellner, Television
and the Crisis of Democracy. The course will include lecture, large- and
small-group discussion, with highly interactive class sessions being the rule
rather than the exceptions. Students should expect to keep a television-viewing
notebook. No previous study of television is assumed.
This course will use lecture and
large and small-group discussion formats, with highly-interactive class
sessions being the rule rather than the exception. Throughout the class, students will be asked to make interpretive
claims about the texts they read and the world they (and their parents and
grandparents) have lived in. Since I
believe that writing is thinking, students can expect to write formally and
informally, both inside and outside of class.
There will be three short
assignments (2-3 pages) and a cumulative medium-length final paper (about 7
pages).
Please see the section titled Grading for more complete information.
A Word on Office Hours and/or
E-mail
In a class of 80, it is
impossible for me to give close attention to each student regularly. My office hours are intended to be
opportunities for students to come for one-on-one discussions about anything:
from writing and research problems to problems with class dynamics. You just want to talk about ideas or
something interesting you’ve read?
Come on in. I like talking with
students. I’ll do my best to make you
feel comfortable. Please, please,
please take advantage of this time.
Sometimes students are
intimidated by one-on-one talks with instructors. If you’re one of these students, use e-mail to write me a
memo. It may take a day or two or three
for me to get back to you, but I will.
If you don’t know about e-mail, call Sheppard Labs or stop into any of
the computer labs on campus to initiate your account. If enough students use E-mail, I can send class announcements and
assignments electronically.
Policy for Human Dignity
All members of the
class will be treated with respect. I
do not believe that honest differences in passion, point of view, and politics
must be erased to facilitate harmony. But throughout this class, thoughtful
dialogue will replace violent confrontation and demeaning behavior whenever
disagreements arise.
Writing
You should make a
backup disk or photocopy of all your work. Error or breakdown—your, mine, or the machine's—can happen. I will hold you responsible to have copies
of your work.
In order to be accepted, all work must be: word processed
in a reasonable font with 1 inch margins, double-spaced, stapled (not paper clipped
or dog-eared), and accompanied by notes and bibliography that conform to MLA or
APA standards. You are responsible for
correct grammar, spelling, and typography.
Pages must be numbered, and your name must appear on each page. I must receive all papers by the meeting
time of the date due.
All
writing will be judged according to how well it meets these criteria:
1) content: How well have you considered/discussed the
task at hand, the meaning of what you have read, thought, seen, or said? How well
have you mustered pertinent information and evidence in support of meaningful
claims? Have you handled facts
accurately?
2) clarity: How well have you expressed your ideas,
arguments, or interpretations? Is your
prose clean and clear, intelligible and jargon-free? How persuasive are your arguments and interpretations.
3) insight: How complete is your paper—have you
considered potential objections to your argument or interpretation? Have you
thought through the social, political, or logical implications of your
argument? Have you gone beyond the
conventional wisdom to consider alternative explanations or interpretations of
your data? Does your paper pass the “So
What?” test?
In order to earn an A for a paper, your writing must excel
in all three categories.
Grading
My grading policy
conforms to CLA guidelines. Be advised
that CLA considers a C to be equivalent to basic fulfillment of the course
requirements. In order to get anything higher than a C, you will have to perform
beyond the basic course requirements.
If your are concerned about your grade, please consult with me early and
often. A's and B's are honors
grades. Please read the following
grading scale carefully.
F.........You turned in the assignment but
did not attempt to fulfill the requirements, or you did not turn in the
assignment.
D.........You attempted to fulfill the
requirements, but did not meet basic standards in content, clarity, and
insight.
C.........You completed the assignment and
satisfied all requirements.
B.........You completed the assignment and
satisfied all requirements. Further, your paper is mechanically perfect, and
you developed and supported an argument, generating new insights.
A.........You completed the assignment and
satisfied all requirements. Your paper is mechanically perfect, and you
expressed your ideas with particular elegance, style, and/or wit. Finally, you developed and supported an argument with
exceptional skill, generating new insights, and placing them in a meaningful
context.
Acts of scholastic dishonesty may
result in an F for the course and additional disciplinary action.
Course-Grade
Breakdown
|
3 Short Essays @ 20% each |
Final Paper @ 40% |
Course-Grade Calculation
All grades in this course will be given in letter
form. The following grades are
available:
|
A+ |
A |
A- |
B+ |
B |
B- |
C+ |
C |
C- |
D+ |
D |
D- |
F |
In order to facilitate calculation, letter grades
correspond to numbers; thus,
|
A+ = |
A = |
A- = |
B+ = |
B = |
B- = |
C+ = |
C = |
C- = |
D+ = |
D = |
D- = |
F = |
|
12 |
11 |
10 |
9 |
8 |
7 |
6 |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
The formula I use to calculate your grade is:
(G1 x .20) + (G2 x
.20) + (G3 x .20) + (G4 x .40) = Final Grade
where G1-3 = the short essays, and G4 = the final paper.
Your final letter grade is assigned based on the result of one of these calculations. Since + and - grades cannot be reported to CLA, the range for each final letter grade is as follows (figures are rounded to one decimal place):
|
A = 12-10 |
B = 9.9 - 7.0 |
C = 6.9 - 4.0 |
D = 3.9 - 1.0 |
F = < 0.9 |
Incompletes
Incompletes will not be
given. If you do not complete an
assignment you will receive no credit for that assignment and your course grade
will reflect this. If there are
specific attenuating circumstances, please contact me immediately.
Readings/Books
These
required books are available at the U of MN bookstore in Williamson Hall:
• Henry
Jenkins. Textual Poachers: Television Fans & Participatory Culture. New York: Routledge, 1992.
• Douglas
Kellner, Television and the Crisis of
Democracy. Boulder, CO: Westview P,
1990.
• Marshall
McLuhan and Quentin Fiore. The Medium is the Massage. [originally
published 1967]
• Lynn Spigel. Make Room for TV:
Television and the Family Ideal in Postwar America. Chicago: U Chicago P, 1992.
• Lynn Spigel and Denise Mann, eds. Private
Screenings: Television and the Female Consumer. Minneapolis: U Minnesota P, 1992.
Other required readings
will be on 2-hour reserve at Walter Library.
Tentative Reading Schedule
|
Week |
Reading |
|
1 |
1. McLuhan and
Fiore, The Medium is the Massage. 2. Lynne Joyrich,
“All That Television Allows” (in Sp. & Mann). |
|
2 |
1. Douglas
Kellner, Television and the Crisis of
Democracy, chs. 1-2. 2. Lynn Spigel, Make Room for TV, Intro. & ch. 1. |
|
3 |
1. Spigel, ch. 2. 2. Mary Beth
Haralovich, “Sit-coms and Suburbs” (in Sp. & Mann). |
|
4 |
1. Spigel, ch. 3. 2. Denise Mann,
“The Spectacularization of Everyday Life” (in Sp. & Mann). |
|
5 |
1. Spigel, ch. 4. 2. George
Lipsitz, “The Meaning of Memory” (in Sp. & Mann). |
|
6 |
1. Spigel, ch. 5
& Epilogue. 2. Aniko
Bodroghkozy, “Is This What You Mean by Color TV?” |
|
7 |
1. Henry Jenkins,
Textual Poachers, chs. 1 & 6. 2. Kellner, ch.
3. |
|
8 |
1. Jenkins, chs.
2 & 5. 2. Kellner, ch.
4. |
|
9 |
1. Jenkins, chs.
3 & 8. 2. Kellner, ch.
5. |
|
10 |
TBA |
|
|