ERIC DROWN

Home

Student Comments

Student Writings

For Current Students

 


American Studies 181/226—Fall 2003                       1957 E St. B17

The George Washington University                       M/W 9:30 – 10:20

Eric Drown, Assistant Professor                                   edrown@gwu.edu

 

   

US Media and Cultural History

 

 

**This syllabus will be made available in alternative media by request**

 

Introduction  

 

 “US Media and Cultural History” is aimed at advanced undergraduates and beginning graduate students.  It treats the histories of mass and niche medias since the end of the Nineteenth Century, with special attention to the values and debates encoded in the promises made about new medias, and the concerns raised about them.  We’ll examine debates surrounding the rise and development of journalism, the cinema, amateur and network radio, “ethnic,” “race” and “pulp” fiction, network television, popular “postmodern” literature, and the World Wide Web.  Along the way, we’ll ask how people used media to understand modernity and postmodernity, to construct, revise, and suppress specific identities, and to make arguments about the past, present, and future of the nation.  We’ll need to define “culture,” discuss how culture has been used to make important distinctions in American society, and consider the ways culture get produced, disseminated and consumed.  Finally, we’ll learn how to analyze cultural products and the popular discourses that accompany them. 

 

Teaching Assistants

 


Stephanie Ricker (ricker@gwu.edu)                                                                                                                                         Kyle Riismandel (kriis@gwu.edu)

 

Office: P 301 @ 2108 G St.

Ph: 202-994-6645

 
Required Readings

 

The following texts have been ordered at the Marvin Center bookstore:

 


Ellen Wartella, et. al., MediaMaking: Mass Media in a Popular Culture (1998)

Theodore Dreiser, Sister Carrie (1900)

Zora Neale Hurston, Moses, Man of the Mountain (1939)

Susan Stryker, Queer Pulps: Perverted Passions from the Golden Age of the Paperback (2001)

Thomas Pynchon, The Crying of Lot 49 (1965)

Tom Robbins, Another Roadside Attraction (1971)

Joanna Russ, The Female Man (1975)


 

Additional required readings are in a course reader available at Penn Press, 1919 Pennsylvania Ave. NW (202-331-8224).

 

Assignments

 

Participation in Discussion Section                     à 30%

 

+ 2 Midterm projects @ 20% each                     à 40%

 

+  1 Final Exam                                            à 30%

                  -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

100%

 

Reading Schedule

 

W 9/3

First Class

M 9/8

Pt. 1 Media, Modernities, and Modernisms: The Promise of Multiplicity and Cultural Contests for Mass Media

  • Christopher Wilson, “Metropolitan Newspapers and the Rise of the Reporter”
  • Richard Wightman Fox, “Intimacy on Trial: Cultural Meanings of the Beecher-Tilton Affair”

W 9/10

  • Theodore Dreiser, Sister Carrie (1900), Chs. 1-25
  • Edna Ferber, “The Girl Who Went Right”

M 9/15

  • Sister Carrie, Chs. 26-47
  • Fannie Hurst, “Seven Candles”

W 9/17

  • Early Cinema
  • Excerpts from Modern Times and Sunrise
  • William Uricchio and Roberta Pearson, “Response to Cultural Crisis: Political Domination and Hegemony” and “The Film Industry’s Drive for Respectability”

M 9/22

  • Susan Douglas, “Popular Culture and Populist Technology: The Amateur Operators, 1906-1912”
  • Susan Douglas, “The Titanic Disaster and Radio Regulation, 1910-1912

W 9/24

  •  Erin Smith, “‘The Ragtag and Bobtail of the Fiction Parade’: Pulp Magazines and the Literary Marketplace”
  • Catherine Moore, “Shambleau” (Weird Tales1933)
  • Hugh B. Cave, “Daughters of Dark Desire” (Dime Mystery Magazine1935).  E-file available for $4.50 as part of “Hugh Cave’s Weird Menace 3 Pack” @ http://www.vintagelibrary.com
    /pulp/weird/index.cfm
  • Hugh B. Cave, “Zannini’s Puppets” (Spicy Mystery Stories 1938).  E-file available for $4.50 as part of “Hugh B. Cave’s Spicy Three Pack #1” @ http://www.vintagelibrary.com/df.cfm?id=90

M 9/29

W 10/1

  • Scr. Tarzan and His Mate (1934)

M 10/6

  • Zora Neale Hurston, Moses, Man of the Mountain (1939)

W 10/8

  • Moses, Man of the Mountain
  • Hurston, “My People, My People”

M 10/13

Pt. 2 WWII, Consensus, and the Other Fifties

  • Jackson Lears, “A Matter of Taste: Corporate Cultural Hegemony in a Mass-Consumption Society”
  • “Television Code of the National Association of Broadcasters” @ http://www.tvhistory.tv/SEAL-Good-Practice.htm
  • Network Broadcasting

W 10/15

  • Network Broadcasting
  • Lynn Spigel, “The People in the Theater Next Door”

M 10/20

  • Network Broadcasting
  • W. T. Lhamon, Jr., “Deliberate Speed”

W 10/22

Midterm Project 1 Due

  • Network Broadcasting

M 10/27

  • Tales from the Crypt
  • Bradford Wright, “Turning Point: Comic Books in Crisis, 1954-1955”
  • Exc. From Seduction of the Innocent
  • The Comics Code of 1954 @ (http://www.comics.dm.net/codetext.htm)
  • Queer Pulp

W 10/29

  • Queer Pulp

M 11/3

Pt. 3.  Cultural Crises

  • Crying of Lot 49 (1965)
  • Port Huron Statement @ (http://lists.village.virgina.edu/sixties/HTML_docs)/

Resources/Primary/Manifestos/SDS_Port_Huron.html)

W 11/5

  • Rowan and Martin’s Laugh-In (1968-9)

M 11/10

§                                            §       Easy Rider (1969)

§                                            §       Tom Robbins, Another Roadside Attraction

W 11/12

§        §       Easy Rider

§        §       Another Roadside Attraction

11/17

§        §        Joanna Russ, The Female Man (1975)

§        §        Charlie’s Angels

11/19

§        §        Female Man

§        §        Mary Tyler Moore Show

11/24

Pt. 4 Counterrevolutions and Niche Media

§        §        Thomas McLaughlin, “Cultural Theory and Social Activism in the Southern Christian Anti-pornography Movement”

§        §        American Family Association Online @ www.afa.net

11/26

§        §        Media Watch @ http://www.mediawatch.com/

12/1

Midterm Project 2 Due

§        §        Heaven’s Gate @ http://www.wave.net/upg/gate/

§        §        The Ross Institute’s page on Heaven’s Gate @ http://www.rickross.com/groups/heavensgate.html

§        §        Wendy Gale Robinson, “Heaven’s Gate: The End?  @ http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol3/issue3/robinson.html

12/3

  • The Napster Debates—Reading to be announced.

12/8

Last Class

12/9

Makeup Day

12/10-11

Reading Days

xx

Final Exam Date

 

Course Policies

Requirements for Written Work

BACKUP: You should make a backup disk or photocopy of all your work.  Error or breakdown—your, mine, or the machine's—can happen.  I will hold you responsible to have copies of your work.  Student should be prepared to submit electronic copies of their work at the request of the instructors.

 

DECLARATION OF AUTHORSHIP: All written work must be accompanied by a signed page with the following declaration:  “I, [name], declare that I am the sole and original author of this work.   This assignment was completed in compliance with the requirements of the course and The George Washington University’s Code of Academic Integrity.”   

 

FORMATTING:  All essays must be word processed in Times New Roman 12, and double-spaced throughout (except for identifying items).  Print on one side of the paper only.  Set left margins to 1.5 inches and right margins to 1 inch.  Do not justify the right side of the page.  All pages must bear the name of the author, be numbered and stapled together.   Do not include a separate title page, nor submit your essay in a cover of any kind. All papers must be neatly printed with a sufficient saturation level of ink to ensure easy legibility.  Papers with text streaked by dirty print cartridges low on ink will not be accepted.

LATE PAPERS: The final grade of papers not submitted on the due date in class during the scheduled meeting time will be reduced 2/3 of a letter grade for each business day late.  No assignments will be accepted more than three business days late. 

 

Academic Dishonesty and Plagiarism

Any act of academic dishonesty will be treated as a serious offense in this class.  By turning in any assignment, students declare that they are the sole and original authors of their work and are in compliance with The George Washington University’s Code of Academic Integrity.  Additionally they assert that they have properly credited any words and ideas not their own (whether those words and ideas originated in a published source, on the Internet, from a multimedia presentation, or from a fellow student).  Students with questions about how to properly credit the work of others should consult with the instructor. 

Acts of scholastic dishonesty may result in an F for the course and additional disciplinary action.

Incompletes

 

Incompletes will not be given for frivolous reasons.  If you do not complete an assignment you will receive no credit for that assignment and your course grade will reflect this.  If there are specific attenuating circumstances, please contact one of us immediately.

 

A Word on Office Hours

Our office hours are intended to be opportunities for students to come for one-on-one discussions about anything: from writing and research problems to problems with class dynamics.  You just want to talk about ideas or something inter­esting you’ve read?  Come on in.  We like talking with students.  We’ll do our best to make you feel comfortable.  Please take advantage of this time.

Phone Messages

If you call any of our offices and find that we are not available, please do not leave voice mail messages for us.  Instead, send an email outlining the problem.  If it is a Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, or Thursday we’ll probably get back to you that day or the next.  If it’s Friday, Saturday, or Sunday, you can expect a reply on Monday. 

 
Reasonable Accommodations for Students with Documented Disabilities

 

Reasonable accommodations will be made for students with documented disabilities.  Students requiring reasonable accommodation must provide me with a documentation letter from Disability Support Services no later than September 15, 2003.  Please contact the office of Disability Support Services (Marvin Center Suite 242; 801 21st St. NW, Washington, DC 20052; Tel. 202-994-8250; V/TDD 202-994-8250; FAX 202-994-7610; dss@gwu.edu with any questions or requests for accommodations.

 
Cell Phones, Pagers, Recording Devices

 

Please turn off all cell phones or pagers before entering the classroom.  If, in case of emergency, you must receive a call during class, please set the ringer on vibrate, rise quickly, exit the classroom, and answer the call outside the room.  In no case may lectures or discussion be recorded on any kind of device without the explicit written consent of the instructor and other participants.

 


How to Survive AS 181/226

 

As you can tell from the syllabus, I’ve assigned a lot of reading for you to do this semester.   Rest assured that it is my intention to see you succeed in this class. [1] [1]   Here’s what I need from you.

 

ü     ü     A commitment to read about an hour a day, every day of the week—7 hours in all for reading.  Add 2 hours a week for writing or research.  That’s 9 hours a week total.

 

ü     ü     A promise that you won’t try to prepare for class in one 7-hour marathon session, no matter how tempting it might be.  Cognitive psychologists have established an inverse correlation between brain fatigue and ability to absorb information; critical thinking processes suffer as well.  Attention and retention begins to decline even within the first hour.

 

ü     ü     Clear and open communication lines.  Tell me when you’re having problems; let me help you design and implement a solution.  Don’t wait and hope that things will get better on their own.

 

Here’s what I’ll offer you in return.

 

Ø    Ø    The 7-hour reading limit will be sacrosanct.  Keep a careful and honest time log: When you hit the 7-hour limit, put your book down, make a last note, and call it a week.

 

Ø    Ø    An opportunity to talk about the readings in class in a supportive environment—every week.  All kinds of questions will be welcomed.

 

Ø    Ø    Explicit guidance on writing assignments and a procedure for working efficiently in your weekly two-hour blocks of time.

 

Sound fair?  Good.  Here’s how we make it work.

 

Reading and Notetaking

 

In order to keep up the pace you’ll need to finish the assigned reading and to make sense of what you’re reading, you need a system—not only for taking notes—but also for the reading process itself.  Here’s one. 

 

Remember that the most abstract or conceptual point in a paragraph is usually either at the beginning of the paragraph or the end.  That’s where you’ll find claims, interpretive statements, theses, conclusions—the stuff that the writer uses to get you to see what s/he wants you to remember.  In between the beginning and the end you’ll find supporting material: examples, statistics, stories, explanations.   So as you read, be sure you understand what the main point of the paragraph is.  Underline the phrase that conveys the main point (and don’t underline anything else—too much clutter in your text will make it useless).  Then, in the left margin write a few (and only a few) words that describe the content of the paragraph.  Not every paragraph will demand such a note.  Just the ones you want to remember.  (You might make an index to your reading as you go.  Write down the page number and the one or two word description label).  In the right margin, make a brief comment now and again.  Try to comment at least every other page.  But don’t get too busy on the page.

 

The following is what your annotated paragraph might look like.  The text is from William Burrows, This New Ocean, an excellent history of the Space Race in the Twentieth century, p. 4.  One thing to note: Burrows is fond of using his conclusions as transition sentences, heading the next paragraph.  So I’ve moved the first sentence of the next paragraph to the end here, for demonstration.


 

 

Paragraph Description

 

Text

 

Comments:

 

 

Conflicting Themes in Space History

The story of the first space age is set in a cauldron whose soup is laced with altruists and scoundrels, visionaries and parasites, heroes and naves.  It is the story of political ideologies that fought relentlessly above the atmosphere, as they did on the planet beneath it, in a dangerous duel for global supremacy that was more illusion that serious possibility.  Using space to help humanity communicate, forecast the weather, and accomplish other beneficial things, and traveling there for the ultimate adventure and refuge, was the central core of the idea.  It was the great philosophical driving force, the engine, that seemed to make a presence in space imperative.  Yet space could be reached only by rockets and the shame of it was that rockets were conceived and reconceived time and again, expressly to wreak unparalleled destruction and kill large numbers of the very people whose enlightenment and salvation they promised.

 

 

 

 

Space is a Cold War battleground, literally and figuratively

 

 

 

How could space be a refuge?

 

 

Inherent paradox of space travel

 

Notice both the secular and religious terms for transcendence

 

Remember, though, that the key to reading quickly and well is to keep moving and look for the big picture, namely the narrative and/or thematic line holding the facts together.

 

OK, so you’ve been reading for 45 or 50 minutes, and you made it through 16 pages.  Skip to the end of the section or the end of the chapter, if you’re close, and scan the ending.  What’s the author’s walk-away point?  The one s/he wants to remember?  Got it?  Good.  Now, before you leave, write a brief paragraph that summarizes the main idea of the section you read today.  When you come back to your reading tomorrow, you’ll use this paragraph to refresh your memory.  Such a paragraph written for the first 18 pages of Burrow’s book might look like this:  The idea of challenging gravity, the “force that holds [humankind] to Earth” (p. 3) has a long history—over 2000 years. Daedalus, Leonardo da Vinci, Lucian, Copernicus, and Tsiolkovsky all used the idea of leaving the earth to challenge established ideas and express aspirations for transcendence.  Rockets had some of their origins in Chinese alchemy; they were used for warfare from the very start.  The adventures of Columbus and the findings of Copernicus and Kepler inspired people to imagine voyages of discovery in the heavens.

 

Notice how I tried to express the main themes of the section, and convey some of the narrative line that substantiates it.  I’ve established that this idea is a fundamental part of the way human beings think about themselves, their societies, and their hopes for the future.  Be sure that you end each reading session by writing this summary paragraph.

 

With this technique, you should be able to assemble functional notes in a reasonably timely fashion.

 

The Writing Process

 

Here’s the process for writing that I recommend.   Break your two-hour writing commitment into two one-hour sittings.  During the first sitting, you need to discover what you find interesting, frame it as an answerable question, and develop a pretty good sense of what your answers are.  This you can do in one hour.  But you can’t do it just by thinking about it.  You’ve got to write during this first hour.  Here’s a schedule for the first hour:

 

First One-Hour Writing Session

§       §       Minutes 1-5:  Brainstorm:  Make a list of single words about which you might write. 

§       §       Minutes 6-15:  2nd Level Brainstorm:  Choose 2 or 3 of those words and make sub-lists.  Try to develop contrasts, similarities, complements,

§       §       Minutes 16-30:  Free-Writing:  Choose one of these list/sub-lists.  Write for 10 minutes about this list.  Don’t try for paragraphs or good sentences, don’t pause to think of a word.  Just keep writing without censoring yourself.  Or, Write as many declarative sentences about the topic as possible.

§       §       Minutes 31-45:  Analyze your free-writing.  Circle suggestive phrases, words, sentences, or examples.  Think about what you might have meant by this or that phrase—make annotations on your free-writing.  Think of examples you might use, and write them down.

§       §       Minutes 46-60:  Focused Free-Writing:  In nutshell fashion write down the main points of your exploratory essay.  You may not get all of them, but you can add more later.  Try to get at least one good paragraph that conveys the gist of your essay.  Write a tentative title for your paper—make it descriptive and a little jazzy.  Write potential walk-in and walk-away sentences.

§       §       TAKE A BREAK

During the second hour you need to produce a short paper.  While you were open to all ideas during the first hour, you need to commit to a few good solid ideas in this second hour.  What are your best points?  How can they be developed?  Don’t strive for breadth; rather teach your reader something interesting about the topic.  Mostly you want to make positive points about what you’ve got to say rather than simply responding to the readings.

Second One-Hour Writing Session

¨     ¨     Minutes 1-5:  Re-read your focused free-writing.  Make any additional notes as they come to you.

¨     ¨     Minutes 6-35:  Write a draft.  Get the main ideas on paper in order.  Install the examples and explanations in the right places.

¨     ¨     Minutes 36-45:  Analyze your draft.  Make your assertions clear.  Check to see that your examples and explanations mean what you think they do.  Check to make sure that you’ve drawn a conclusion at the end of each main point.

¨     ¨     Minutes 45-60:  Polish the draft.  Refine the title.  Make sure that you have a beginning that introduces your topic, a middle that explains a set of points, and a conclusion that tells the reader what to think about you’ve written.  Be sure that you have good walk-in and walk-away sentences.

 

 

 

 

 



[1] [1] To be clear, my definition of “success in the class” is not “to get an A.”  I define success as passing the class, becoming grounded in the fundamentals of the topic, and developing intellectual skills such as reading, writing, interpretation, explanation, and presenting ideas.