ERIC DROWN

Home

Student Comments

Student Writings

For Current Students

 

 


AMST 3113: American Cultural Diversity—Extension

 

University of Minnesota

Summer Session II 1998

Blegen Hall 110

T Th  6:00 - 8:30

Instructor: Eric Drown

 

                                                           

                                                                                                           

Office:                           Meet in Blegen Hall Commons                              Writing Lab: 306 Lind Hall

Office Hours:                 5-6, T, Th.                                                                          American Studies Office: 104 Scott Hall

E-mail address:             drown001@maroon.tc.umn.edu              
                                   

 

Introduction

Discussions of “cultural diversity” often conceive of it as a “problem” to be “solved” by acts of individual tolerance and good will.  Alternatively, “cultural diversity” is understood as one of America’s greatest national resources, to be celebrated, cherished, and exploited in a world increasingly forced by geo-politics and economics to confront the realities of cultural diversity.  In this class, we’ll examine the concept of “cultural diversity,” starting from the claim that the present fascination with “cultural diversity” has little to do with interpersonal “problems” created by actual encounters with people from “diverse” cultures (white folks like me often use “diversity” as a euphemism for those significant racial or ethnic differences which continue to shape American economic, political, and cultural life).  Instead, our thesis will be that the current debates about the history, meaning, and value of “cultural diversity” in the United States are an important feature of an on-going political struggle to define, defend, and exploit a dominant understanding of America’s past, present, and future.  Further, we’ll test the claim that this struggle manifests itself in competing visions of “American tradition,” and that these visions are often constituted in relation to a narrative of American history I call “The Story of America.”

In order to understand these claims in a concrete way, we’ll seek out the ways Americans’ tell themselves stories about their past, present, and future.  One way we’ll do this work is by reading novels which meditate on the history of racial, ethnic, and cultural conflict by linking the process of identity formation to larger economic, political, or social circumstances.  We’ll ask of these novels what roles such conflict has played in the establishment, development, and maintenance of American society, and consider along with them the prospects for a just American future.  Titles include:  Orson Scott Card, Pastwatch: The Redemption of Christopher Columbus; Octavia Butler, Kindred; Amy Tan, The Joy Luck Club; Gerald Vizenor, The Heirs of Columbus.  These novels will be supplemented by non-fiction writings by a wide-range of “experts”, ranging from former President George Bush to college newspaper editors.  Additionally, in order to see how “cultural diversity” functions as an idea in everyday life, I’ll ask you to collect the opinions of a few of your acquaintances, and to research some examples of how journalists have

This course will use lecture and large and small-group discussion formats, with highly-interactive class sessions being the rule rather than the exception.  Throughout the class, students will be asked to make interpretive claims about the texts they read and the world they (and their parents and grandparents) have lived in.  Since I believe that writing is thinking, students can expect to write formally and informally, both inside and outside of class. 

Students will be asked to write 1 short research report, and two medium-length essays on topics to be assigned by the instructor.


A Word on Office Hours and/or E-mail

My office hours are intended to be opportunities for students to come for one-on-one discussions about anything: from writing and research problems to problems with class dynamics.  You just want to talk about ideas or something inter­esting you’ve read?  Come on in.  I like talking with students.  I’ll do my best to make you feel comfortable.  Please, please, please take advantage of this time. 

Sometimes students are intimidated by one-on-one talks with instructors.  If you’re one of these students, use e-mail to write me a memo.  It may take a day or two or three for me to get back to you, but I will.  If you don’t know about e-mail, call Sheppard Labs or stop into any of the computer labs on campus to initiate your account.  If enough students use E-mail, I can send class announcements and assignments electronically.

 

Policy for Human Dignity

All members of the class will be treated with respect.  I do not believe that honest differences in passion, point of view, and politics must be erased to facilitate harmony. But throughout this class, thoughtful dialogue will replace violent confrontation and demeaning behavior whenever disagreements arise.

Writing

You should make a backup disk or photocopy of all your work.  Error or breakdown—your, mine, or the machine's—can happen.  I will hold you responsible to have copies of your work. 

In order to be accepted, all work must be: word processed in a reasonable font with 1 inch margins, double-spaced, stapled (not paper clipped or dog-eared), and accompanied by notes and bibliography that conform to MLA or APA standards.  You are responsible for correct grammar, spelling, and typography.  Pages must be numbered, and your name must appear on each page.  I must receive all papers by the meeting time of the date due.   

 

All writing will be judged according to how well it meets these criteria:

1) content:  How well have you considered/discussed the task at hand, the meaning of what you have read, thought, seen, or said? How well have you mustered pertinent information and evidence in support of mean­ingful claims?  Have you handled facts accurately?

2) clarity:  How well have you expressed your ideas, arguments, or interpretations?  Is your prose clean and clear, intelligible and jargon-free? 

3) insight:  How complete is your paper—have you considered potential objections to your argument or in­terpretation? Have you thought through the social, political, or logical implications of your argument?  How persuasive are your arguments and interpretations.  Have you gone beyond the conventional wisdom to consider alternative explanations or interpretations of your data?  Does your paper pass the “So What?” test?

In order to earn an A for a paper, your writing must excel in all three categories.

Grading

My grading policy conforms to CLA guidelines.  Be advised that CLA considers a C to be equivalent to basic fulfillment of the course requirements.  In order to get anything higher than a C, you will have to perform beyond the basic course requirements.  If your are concerned about your grade, please consult with me early and often.  A's and B's are honors grades.  Please read the following grading scale carefully.

 

F.........You turned in the assignment but did not attempt to fulfill the requirements, or you did not turn in the assignment.

D.........You attempted to fulfill the requirements, but did not meet basic standards in content, clarity, and insight.

C.........You completed the assignment and satisfied all requirements.

B.........You completed the assignment and satisfied all requirements. Further, your paper is mechanically perfect, and you developed and supported an argument, generating new insights. 

A.........You completed the assignment and satisfied all requirements. Your paper is mechanically perfect, and you expressed your ideas with particular elegance, style, and/or wit. Finally,  you developed and supported an argument with exceptional skill, generating new insights, and placing them in a meaningful context.

 

Acts of scholastic dishonesty may result in an F for the course and additional disciplinary action.

Course-Grade Breakdown

 

1 research report @ 20%, 2 essays @ 40% each

 

 

Course-Grade Calculation

 

All grades in this course will be given in letter form.  The following grades are available:

 

A+

A

A-

B+

B

B-

C+

C

C-

D+

D

D-

F

 

In order to facilitate calculation, letter grades correspond to numbers; thus,

 

A+ =

A =

A- =

B+ =

B =

B- =

C+ =

C =

C- =

D+ =

D =

D- =

F =

12

11

10

9

8

7

6

5

4

3

2

1

0

 

The formula I use to calculate your grade is:

 

            (G1 x .20) + (G2 x .40) + (G3 x .40) = Final Grade

 

Your final letter grade is assigned based on the result of this calculation (figures are rounded to one decimal place).

Incompletes

Incompletes will not be given.  If you do not complete an assignment you will receive no credit for that assignment and your course grade will reflect this.  If there are specific attenuating circumstances, please contact me immediately.

Readings/Books

These required books are available at the U of MN bookstore in Williamson Hall, but Card and Tan are widely available as mass-market paperbacks.  Butler is often found used or new at Uncle Hugo’s Science Fiction Bookstore or at Dreamhaven Books.  For used copies of all titles, check Cummings Rare & Used Books (Dinkytown) or The Bookhouse (Dinkytown and St. Paul) or your favorite used bookstore. 

       Orson Scott Card, Pastwatch: The Redemption of Christopher Columbus.

       Amy Tan, The Joy Luck Club.

       Octavia Butler, Kindred.

       Gerald Vizenor, The Heirs of Columbus.

 

The following readings will be on 2-hour reserve at Wilson Library:

 

• George Bush, et. al., “Mosaic”

• Martin Duberman, “Gay and Lesbian Studies for Everyone”

• Shawn Wong, “Stereotypes and Sensibilities”

• Roger Wilkins, “Bad Old Days”

• Todd Gitlin, “On the Virtues of a Loose Canon”

• Patricia Williams, “Defending the Gains”

• Troy Duster, “Beyond the Myth”

• Katharine Bartlett, “Surplus Visibility”

• Teachers for a Democratic Culture, “Statement of Principles”

National Association of Scholars, “The Wrong Way to Reduce Campus Tensions”

• Dinesh D’Souza, “Visigoths in Tweed”

• Arthur Schlesinger, Jr., “Multiculturalism v. The Bill of Rights”

• John Higham, “Multiculturalism and Universalism”

• Mazie, et. al, “To Deconstruct Race, Deconstruct Whiteness”

• Marilyn Frye, “On Being White”

• bell hooks, “Representations of Whiteness”

• bell hooks, “Eating the Other”

 

 

 

 

Tentative Reading Schedule

 

Wilson Reserve Summer Hours:

M-Th, 9-8

Fri, 9-5

Sat, 12-5

Sun, 4-8

 

Week

Reading  [* = @ Wilson Reserve;  (#) = # of pages]

0

Th. 7/23--First class

1

T.  7/28--Butler, Kindred; hooks, “Representations of Whiteness”* (8), Higham, et. al* (27).

Th.  7/30--Butler, Kindred; Frye* (9); Definition assignment due.  

2

T.  8/4--Card, Pastwatch; Bush, et. al. “Mosaic”* (6), Duberman* (2), Wong* (2), Wilkins* (2), Gitlin* (4).

Th.  8/6--Card, Pastwatch; Williams* (6), Duster* (2), Bartlett* (2), Teachers for a Democratic Culture* (4), National Association of Scholars* (3), D’Souza* (7)

3

T.  8/11--Tan, The Joy Luck Club; Essay 1 due.

Th.  8/13--Tan, The Joy Luck Club; Schlesinger* (5), hooks, “Eating the Other”* (10).

4

T.  8/18--Vizenor, The Heirs of Columbus; Mazie, et. al.* (7)

Th.  8/20--Vizenor, The Heirs of Columbus

5

T.  8/25-- Essay 2 due.